This section is for DISCUSSIONS ONLY

You can report bugs/issues in the 🛠 Technical Support corner.

Pull odds should be displayed for each card and not for each category

Chris
Chris Member ✭
in GENERAL DISCUSSIONS

This weekend was a mess, but you are already aware of that. This is about pulls. I’ve spent about $1000 in the last 30 days on this game. Really lots of $100 pulls. While I am aware of the odds posted on pulls, I am extremely disappointed in how predictable it has become.. The number of duplicates and the odds of pulling the shards as the feature and the lowest possible number of shards. I don’t even mind getting cards I already have, but it’s the same ones over and over. Pretty common knowledge in our faction and most factions. You should have the same number of odds of getting any card of in any certain rarity. So if you pull a common card, there should be equal odds of pulling any of the pulls listed under the commons.. same if you pull a rare, or mega rare, or featured.. You guys preach fairness, but you are basically selling snake oil. Spending $1000 and having nothing to show for it is really making me consider just gambling my money away, odds are much better on a return that way. I will do my best to keep up as a free to play player from here out, but I really don’t see that lasting long. Year after year this game has become must pay to stay remotely competitive.. I clearly have had no issues with spending, but there is just no value in doing it anymore. Also, people spend more when they hit more… maybe try a business model where you and the consumer both can benefit?

Comments

  • Stagger Lee
    Stagger Lee Moderator Moderator
    https://community.wwechampions.com/discussion/10093/pull-odds-should-be-displayed-for-each-card-and-not-for-each-category

    Just a reminder that there are no "cards" in champions only posters. Your feedback has been passed along as well.

  • zappadad
    zappadad Member ✭✭✭

    I agree that the weight and odds of each individual "Poster" not the rarity should be made available to help us decide on what we should or should not risk spending our money on.

  • CardenasAucapan
    CardenasAucapan Member ✭✭✭

    This is something I have brought up before, the fact that we don't get the full, complete odds of everything you could pull from loot, you know the rarity odds, but not the specific Poster odds.

    The thing is Scopely is obliged by Apple and Google to do this, but only giving the odds for rarity is their way to go around being completely specific about each Poster. I'm afraid Scopely doesn't want to mention the reality of it because it could annoy the fanbase greatly and drive them to not spend due to the low odds instead of making a more informed decision.

    I TRULY hope that's not the case, but when you are hiding those details, is certainly suspicious. I think it would be very healthy for Scopely to do so to regain some trust with the community, and wouldn't hurt to also point out the odds for the Free Bags (while the community keeps in mind we are talking about freebies too).

    And to add to the whole theme recently of "40 pulls guarantees you something useful" I'd think having a pity system for certain Loot pulls could also give back to the community. For example, I play another gacha game that clearly states "You only have 0,0060% odds to pull one of the special characters for this banner" but after making about 120 pulls you are guaranteed a Selector to choose one of the banner's characters. Or even Genshin Impact, after like 140 pulls (could be more or less depending on luck) you are also guaranteed the 5-Star character from the current banner.

    I'm aware this is kinda weird to do for Champions, because unlike those other games you only need a single copy of the character to unlock most of its potential, but it could be done for specific loots, characters who need gears/plates for full potential, or even characters not currently in rotation (if the WWE allows them).

  • DrWhargoul
    DrWhargoul Member ✭✭✭✭

    Absolutely agree. The hidden, second tier of odds has to go. Just be straight with us

  • D0ngz420
    D0ngz420 Member ✭✭✭

    They will never implement this because it exposes the grift.

  • Unknown
    Unknown
    This content has been removed.

Categories